AI Augmented Architecture Scenario for Cloud Migration Planning

Months of migration discovery, grounded in your architecture model from day one.

The CIO has made the commitment and the architecture team owns the wave plan. The application portfolio, the dependency data, and the lifecycle metadata the plan requires are already in the Sparx EA model the team maintains. AI Power Tools for EA reads that model directly: portfolio readiness scan in minutes, dependency-driven wave groupings with rationale on every grouping, deprecated-dependency flags before the wave is approved. The discovery problem is solved by reading the model, not by conducting surveys.

PORTFOLIO (SPARX EA MODEL) DEPENDENCY ANALYSIS WAVE GROUPINGS Customer Data Platform High fan-in · dependency hub Active Identity Services Auth provider · upstream dependency Active Customer Onboarding Downstream of CDP + Identity Active Account Opening Service Depends on Legacy Middleware ⚠ Active Loan Processing Core processing · Wave 2 Active Reporting Portal No connections — orphan detected Active DEPRECATED Legacy Middleware Pre-migration decision required Wave 1 high fan-in — migrate first Customer Data Platform Identity Services ↑ 12 downstream consumers Wave 2 dependent on Wave 1 systems Customer Onboarding Account Opening Svc ! Deprecated dependency: pre-migration decision required Loan Processing Wave 3 remaining applications after orphan review Reporting Portal — verify first Architect Review proposals · not final outputs DEPENDENCY-DRIVEN WAVE PLANNING FROM EA MODEL

SEE IT IN ACTION

Cloud Migration Planning with AI Power Tools for EA — demo

Demo video — coming soon

Deprecated-dependency flag visible on Account Opening Service alongside Sparx EA diagram in Claude response

The Challenge

Enterprise architecture teams face real friction

📋

The discovery phase takes months before the analysis even starts.

The application inventory is built from surveys. Fourteen surveys go out, eleven come back, three come back incomplete. The migration team consolidates responses into a spreadsheet. Duplicates are reconciled. The spreadsheet becomes the current-state picture. Only then does the actual analysis start — at week six, on data that was already aging at week one.

🔗

The wave plan is assembled from memory and revised every time someone remembers a dependency.

Dependencies drive sequencing, but the dependency data in the surveys is whatever application owners recalled. Wave groupings are built in review workshops. Someone remembers a dependency that was not in the inventory. The plan is revised. The steering committee gets an updated draft. The real dependencies surface as blockers mid-wave.

📊

The migration inventory and the architecture model are two separate things that immediately diverge.

The migration spreadsheet and the Sparx EA model both describe the application portfolio. They are built at different times, from different sources, and maintained separately. Every update to one requires manual reconciliation with the other. The gap grows throughout the migration program.

When you use AI Augmented Architecture for Cloud Migration Planning

When AI Power Tools for EA is configured for your Sparx EA environment

1

The portfolio readiness profile comes from the model, not from surveys.

AI Power Tools for EA runs aggregate_portfolio against your existing Sparx EA repository: lifecycle stage distribution, technology platform groupings, business domain assignments, ownership coverage. It runs find_orphan_elements to surface applications with no connector relationships — the applications that would have been missed in any survey. The readiness profile is ready before the first discovery meeting.

2

Wave groupings come from the dependency graph, not from workshop recall.

AI Power Tools for EA walks the full dependency topology for every application in scope. Applications that share dependencies group together. High fan-in applications get scheduled in earlier waves so they do not block what comes after. The rationale for every grouping is explicit in the output: which dependency relationships produced which grouping, which applications are high fan-in and why, which deprecated downstream dependencies require pre-migration decisions.

3

Deprecated-dependency risks surface before the wave is approved.

The dependency walk identifies applications that depend on platforms with a Deprecated lifecycle status. Each flag carries an explicit note: this is a pre-migration decision, not a mechanical fix. The options are stated. The program office and the architect make the call with full information before the wave is in flight.

4

The stakeholder wave plan is produced from the current model.

Ask AI Power Tools for EA for the steering-committee version: business language throughout, per-wave summary, deprecated-dependency callouts, embedded diagrams. The document is produced from the current model state. The rationale is on every grouping. When a board member asks why an application is in wave two and not wave one, the answer is in the document.

AI POWER TOOLS FOR ENTERPRISE ARCHITECT

Start using it today.

86 tools. Full read/write access to your Sparx EA model. Seven-day free trial. No credit card required to start.

Buy AI Power Tools for EA

HOW TO GET STARTED

AI Power Tools for EA for your environment

Plan

Understand your starting point

  • Identify the AI Augmented Architecture use cases and specific scenarios you want to focus on
  • Assess the current state of your Sparx EA deployment (configuration, metamodel, consistency, completeness) and understand what is needed to get ready for AI
  • Review the technical operating environment (AI platforms, EA versions, repository types, software installation constraints)
  • Assess training needs for your architecture team
  • Build an achievable plan aligned to your goals
FEATURED

Build

Get AI Power Tools for EA running

  • AI Power Tools for EA configured and deployed on architects' workstations
  • Skills Library loaded in your AI platform of choice
  • Rules sidecar populated with your governance conventions
  • Reference repository extended or built (if needed)

Train

Build the habit across your team

  • Architects trained on how to use the new tools for AI Augmented Architecture
  • Mentoring engagement for individual architects (if needed)
  • Sparx Office Hours sessions set up for ongoing team-based mentoring

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common questions

Does AI Power Tools for EA replace the migration inventory spreadsheet? +

No. AI Power Tools for EA reads the Sparx EA model and produces a wave plan grounded in the architecture. If your migration program uses a separate inventory spreadsheet, AI Power Tools for EA does not replace it — it gives you an architecture-grounded basis to validate and update it. Over time, the goal is to reduce reliance on the separate spreadsheet by keeping the EA model current.

Our EA model has gaps in the dependency data. Can it still be used for wave planning? +

Yes. No model is complete. AI Power Tools for EA's orphan detection and dependency walk surface the specific gaps that affect wave planning. The readiness profile tells you exactly what is missing and where. That is a better starting point than a survey inventory, which has the same gaps but does not make them visible until a wave is blocked.

We already use Azure Migrate for cloud readiness. How does this fit? +

Azure Migrate and AI Power Tools for EA address different parts of the migration picture. Azure Migrate handles cloud-side readiness: server discovery, infrastructure dependency mapping, migration tracking. AI Power Tools for EA handles the architecture-model side: logical dependency relationships, lifecycle metadata, business domain assignments, orphan detection. Both inputs belong in the wave plan. They are complementary.

The wave plan is in flight. Is it too late to use this? +

For an organization mid-migration, the most valuable immediate use is auditing the current wave plan against the current model. get_updates_in_range surfaces changes to the model since a given date. That analysis tells you specifically where the current wave plan has diverged from the current architecture — which is exactly the information needed to decide whether to course-correct before the next wave.

What happens to our repository data? +

Your architecture models sit in your repository — whether local model files or a shared DBMS repository. AI Power Tools for EA runs on top of your Enterprise Architect client and connects to your data using the same methods modelers use through the UI. No data is retained between sessions. Nothing leaves your environment through a separate channel.

See the dependency-driven wave plan produced from a real Sparx EA model.

Watch the four-minute demo, or schedule a call and we will walk through it against yours.

Schedule a Discovery Call